Stainless Steel XM-9-H1150 vs XM-9-H900
Stainless Steel · XM-9 temper comparison
XM-9-H1150 and XM-9-H900 are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, XM-9: H1150 (overaged 621 °C (1150 °F) for 4 h, maximum toughness) versus H900 (aged 482 °C (900 °F) for 1 h, peak hardness). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. XM-9-H900 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) against 795 MPa (115 ksi) for XM-9-H1150, about 56% more; tensile strength follows at 1,345 MPa (195 ksi) vs 930 MPa (135 ksi). In exchange, XM-9-H1150 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 12% for XM-9-H900, and XM-9-H900 is harder (400 HB vs 285 HB). XM-9-H1150 runs hotter in service (450°C vs 315°C continuous). On the shop floor, XM-9-H1150 machines more easily (fair vs poor).
XM-9-H1150Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
XM-9-H900Choose it when strength drives the design.
XM-9-H1150 vs XM-9-H900: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all stainless steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all stainless steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell C
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28 · Compressive Strength 1,275 MPa185 ksi · Shear Strength 800 MPa116 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in · Hardness, Vickers 425 HV
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Same in both: Density 7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16.3 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -75°C-103 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 25% · Weldability 45 / 100 · Formability (cold) 20 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100 · Polishability 75 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.7 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 45%
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
XM-9-H1150 vs XM-9-H900 — frequently asked
Is XM-9-H900 stronger than XM-9-H1150?
Yes. XM-9-H900 has a typical yield strength of 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) against 795 MPa (115 ksi) for XM-9-H1150 — about 56% more. Tensile strength is 1,345 MPa (195 ksi) vs 930 MPa (135 ksi).
Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, H1150 or H900?
H900 is the default XM-9 condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.
Which is easier to machine, XM-9-H1150 or XM-9-H900?
XM-9-H1150. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (25/100) for XM-9-H900.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in XM-9-H1150 and XM-9-H900 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.