FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel ER309 vs ER309Cb

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel ER309 and ER309Cb are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 400 MPa — strength does not separate them. ER309Cb is harder — 190 HB against 180 HB for ER309 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. ER309 runs hotter in service (1,000°C vs 800°C continuous). On the shop floor, ER309 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER309Cb (high, $$$$).

ER309Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ER309CbChoose it when surface hardness matters.

ER309 vs ER309Cb: properties

ER309ER309Cb

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

145 GPa21 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

400 MPa58 ksi
410 MPa59.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
35%

Reduction in Area

50%
45%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

140 MPa·√m127 ksi·√in
150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

75 J55.3 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

89 HRB
90 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
200 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 196 GPa28.4 Msi · Shear Modulus 76 GPa11 Msi · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 600 MPa87 ksi · Shear Strength 390 MPa56.6 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 240 MPa34.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,000°C1,832 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

34 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

38%
35%

Weldability

92 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Modulus of Resilience

408 kJ/m³
429 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 76 kN·m/kg · Specific Stiffness (E / density) 24.8 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 3.8 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER309ER309Cb

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityER309ER309Cb
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

ER309 vs ER309Cb — frequently asked

What is the difference between ER309 and ER309Cb?

Stainless Steel ER309 and ER309Cb are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 400 MPa — strength does not separate them. ER309Cb is harder — 190 HB against 180 HB for ER309 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, ER309 or ER309Cb?

ER309 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ER309Cb is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose ER309 over ER309Cb?

Pick ER309 when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick ER309Cb when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ER309 and ER309Cb side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.