FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel Alloy 28-CD vs Alloy 28 HW-CW

Stainless Steel · Alloy 28 temper comparison

Alloy 28-CD and Alloy 28 HW-CW are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, Alloy 28: CD (cold drawn) versus HW-CW (high-strength cold worked tube). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. Alloy 28 HW-CW is the stronger of the two: yield strength 750 MPa (109 ksi) against 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) for Alloy 28-CD, about 44% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 750 MPa (109 ksi). In exchange, Alloy 28-CD is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 15% for Alloy 28 HW-CW, and Alloy 28 HW-CW is harder (290 HB vs 230 HB). Alloy 28-CD runs hotter in service (450°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, Alloy 28-CD machines more easily (32 vs 20 out of 100) and Alloy 28-CD welds better (65 vs 55 out of 100).

Alloy 28-CDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Alloy 28 HW-CWChoose it when strength drives the design.

Alloy 28-CD vs Alloy 28 HW-CW: properties

Alloy 28-CDAlloy 28 HW-CW

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

750 MPa109 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
15%

Reduction in Area

45%
40%

Shear Strength

460 MPa66.7 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

230 HB
290 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

98 HRB
100 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

242 HV
305 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 195 GPa28.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 163 GPa23.6 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,350°C2,462 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,370°C2,498 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 11.5 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 14.5 µm/m·K8.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 280 J/g120 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.7 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
14%

Weldability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 50 / 100 · Polishability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 8 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 28

Alloy 28-CD vs Alloy 28 HW-CW — frequently asked

Is Alloy 28 HW-CW stronger than Alloy 28-CD?

Yes. Alloy 28 HW-CW has a typical yield strength of 750 MPa (109 ksi) against 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) for Alloy 28-CD — about 44% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 750 MPa (109 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, CD or HW-CW?

SA is the default Alloy 28 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither CD nor HW-CW). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, Alloy 28-CD or Alloy 28 HW-CW?

Alloy 28-CD, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 20/100 for Alloy 28 HW-CW; for welding the order is Alloy 28-CD first (good, 65/100) then Alloy 28 HW-CW (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 28-CD and Alloy 28 HW-CW side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.