FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel AL-6XN-CD vs AL-6XN CW-1/2H

Stainless Steel · AL-6XN temper comparison

AL-6XN-CD and AL-6XN CW-1/2H are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, AL-6XN: CD (cold drawn) versus CW-1/2H (1/2 Hard). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. AL-6XN CW-1/2H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 830 MPa (120 ksi) against 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) for AL-6XN-CD, about 34% more; tensile strength follows at 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) vs 860 MPa (125 ksi). In exchange, AL-6XN-CD is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 12% for AL-6XN CW-1/2H, and AL-6XN CW-1/2H is harder (310 HB vs 250 HB). AL-6XN-CD runs hotter in service (400°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, AL-6XN-CD welds better (very good vs good).

AL-6XN-CDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AL-6XN CW-1/2HChoose it when strength drives the design.

AL-6XN-CD vs AL-6XN CW-1/2H: properties

AL-6XN-CDAL-6XN CW-1/2H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

860 MPa125 ksi
1,030 MPa149 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
830 MPa120 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
12%

Reduction in Area

50%
40%

Shear Strength

515 MPa74.7 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

385 MPa55.8 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

175 MPa·√m159 ksi·√in
130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

150 J111 ft·lbf
100 J73.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
310 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

99 HRB
88 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

262 HV
325 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 195 GPa28.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 162 GPa23.5 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8.06 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,320°C2,408 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 11.5 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 456 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 15.3 µm/m·K8.5 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 280 J/g120 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

8.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35 µΩ·in
9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.9 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.08 V · Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

28%
22%

Weldability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
28 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 50 / 100 · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 6 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAL-6XN

AL-6XN-CD vs AL-6XN CW-1/2H — frequently asked

Is AL-6XN CW-1/2H stronger than AL-6XN-CD?

Yes. AL-6XN CW-1/2H has a typical yield strength of 830 MPa (120 ksi) against 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) for AL-6XN-CD — about 34% more. Tensile strength is 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) vs 860 MPa (125 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, CD or CW-1/2H?

Solution Annealed is the default AL-6XN condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither CD nor CW-1/2H). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, AL-6XN-CD or AL-6XN CW-1/2H?

AL-6XN-CD, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 20/100 for AL-6XN CW-1/2H; for welding the order is AL-6XN-CD first (very good, 70/100) then AL-6XN CW-1/2H (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AL-6XN-CD and AL-6XN CW-1/2H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.