FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 420 vs SUS431

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 420 and SUS431 are both stainless steel grades. SUS431 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 680 MPa (98.6 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420, about 89% more; tensile strength follows at 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, 420 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 16% for SUS431, and SUS431 is harder (270 HB vs 200 HB). 420 runs hotter in service (650°C vs 550°C continuous) and 420 conducts heat better (24.9 W/m·K vs 20 W/m·K). On the shop floor, SUS431 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 420 (premium, $$$).

420Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

SUS431Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

420 vs SUS431: properties

420SUS431

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
880 MPa128 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
680 MPa98.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
16%

Reduction in Area

55%
50%

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
530 MPa76.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
270 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
285 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
27 HRC

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,454°C2,649 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24.9 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
550°C1,022 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.3 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
35%

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

324 kJ/m³
1,156 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
5.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale420SUS431

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability420SUS431
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

420 vs SUS431 — frequently asked

Is SUS431 stronger than 420?

Yes. SUS431 has a typical yield strength of 680 MPa (98.6 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420 — about 89% more. Tensile strength is 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 420 or SUS431?

SUS431 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 420 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 420 or SUS431?

420, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for SUS431.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 420 and SUS431 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.