FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 420 vs SUH4

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 420 and SUH4 are both stainless steel grades. SUH4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 730 MPa (106 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420, about 103% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, 420 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 12% for SUH4, and SUH4 is harder (300 HB vs 200 HB). SUH4 is stiffer (215 GPa vs 200 GPa) and SUH4 runs hotter in service (800°C vs 650°C continuous). On the shop floor, 420 machines more easily (fair vs poor).

420Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

SUH4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

420 vs SUH4: properties

420SUH4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
215 GPa31.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
83 GPa12 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
730 MPa106 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
12%

Reduction in Area

55%
25%

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in
25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
300 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
315 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
32 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,454°C2,649 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24.9 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.3 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F
10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
48 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.3 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
25%

Weldability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Polishability

85 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
80 L/kg9.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
123 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
27.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

324 kJ/m³
1,239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
5.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale420SUH4

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability420SUH4
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

420 vs SUH4 — frequently asked

Is SUH4 stronger than 420?

Yes. SUH4 has a typical yield strength of 730 MPa (106 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420 — about 103% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 420 or SUH4?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 420 or SUH4?

420. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (22/100) for SUH4; for welding the order is 420 first (poor, 25/100) then SUH4 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 420 and SUH4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.