FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 420 vs SUH1

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 420 and SUH1 are both stainless steel grades. SUH1 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420, about 111% more; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, 420 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 18% for SUH1, and SUH1 is harder (295 HB vs 200 HB). SUH1 is stiffer (215 GPa vs 200 GPa) and SUH1 runs hotter in service (750°C vs 650°C continuous). On the shop floor, 420 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and SUH1 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 420 (premium, $$$).

420Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

SUH1Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

420 vs SUH1: properties

420SUH1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
215 GPa31.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
83 GPa12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
18%

Reduction in Area

55%
45%

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
15 J11.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
295 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
310 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
31 HRC

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,454°C2,649 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24.9 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.3 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
750°C1,382 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.45 V

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
35%

Weldability

25 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
18 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
130 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
27.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

324 kJ/m³
1,343 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
5.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale420SUH1

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability420SUH1
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

420 vs SUH1 — frequently asked

Is SUH1 stronger than 420?

Yes. SUH1 has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420 — about 111% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 420 or SUH1?

SUH1 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 420 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 420 or SUH1?

420, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for SUH1.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 420 and SUH1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.