FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 316H 1/2H vs 316H-CD

Stainless Steel · 316H temper comparison

316H 1/2H and 316H-CD are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 316H: 1/2H (half hard) versus CD (cold drawn). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 316H 1/2H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 800 MPa (116 ksi) against 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) for 316H-CD, about 60% more; tensile strength follows at 1,070 MPa (155 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, 316H-CD is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 9% for 316H 1/2H, and 316H 1/2H is harder (310 HB vs 220 HB). 316H-CD runs hotter in service (815°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, 316H-CD machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 316H-CD welds better (very good vs good).

316H 1/2HChoose it when strength drives the design.

316H-CDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

316H 1/2H vs 316H-CD: properties

316H 1/2H316H-CD

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,070 MPa155 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

800 MPa116 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
28%

Reduction in Area

35%
50%

Compressive Strength

820 MPa119 ksi
245 MPa35.5 ksi

Shear Strength

640 MPa92.8 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

440 MPa63.8 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
140 J103 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

310 HB
220 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
96 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

330 HV
235 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 166 GPa24.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.98 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,375°C2,507 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
815°C1,499 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16.3 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 15.9 µm/m·K8.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.3 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

63 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.05 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
42 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

28%
42%

Weldability

60 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Castability 45 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100 · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 60%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale316H

316H 1/2H vs 316H-CD — frequently asked

Is 316H 1/2H stronger than 316H-CD?

Yes. 316H 1/2H has a typical yield strength of 800 MPa (116 ksi) against 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) for 316H-CD — about 60% more. Tensile strength is 1,070 MPa (155 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, 1/2H or CD?

Annealed is the default 316H condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither 1/2H nor CD). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 316H 1/2H or 316H-CD?

316H-CD. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (30/100) for 316H 1/2H; for welding the order is 316H-CD first (very good, 75/100) then 316H 1/2H (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 316H 1/2H and 316H-CD side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.