FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4923 vs 420

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4923 and 420 are both stainless steel grades. 1.4923 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 680 MPa (98.6 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420, about 89% more; tensile strength follows at 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, 420 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 17% for 1.4923, and 1.4923 is harder (265 HB vs 200 HB). 1.4923 is stiffer (216 GPa vs 200 GPa) and 420 runs hotter in service (650°C vs 550°C continuous). On the shop floor, 420 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100).

1.4923Choose it when strength drives the design.

420Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1.4923 vs 420: properties

1.4923420

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

216 GPa31.3 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

84 GPa12.2 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

880 MPa128 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

680 MPa98.6 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

17%
22%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Shear Strength

530 MPa76.9 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

410 MPa59.5 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

265 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

280 HV
210 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
93 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 55%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,454°C2,649 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24.9 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F
10.3 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

550°C1,022 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.32 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
45%

Weldability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

46 MJ/kg19,776 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

100 L/kg12 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
89 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.1 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,070 kJ/m³
324 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.8 mm²/s
7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale4201.4923

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4923420
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4923 vs 420 — frequently asked

Is 1.4923 stronger than 420?

Yes. 1.4923 has a typical yield strength of 680 MPa (98.6 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420 — about 89% more. Tensile strength is 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4923 or 420?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4923 or 420?

420, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for 1.4923; for welding the order is 1.4923 first (poor, 30/100) then 420 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4923 and 420 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.