FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.3940 vs 1.3955

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.3940 and 1.3955 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 250 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1.3955 runs hotter in service (760°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1.3940 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 1.3940 forms better (fair vs poor).

1.3940Choose it when it will be welded.

1.3955Choose it when the part sees heat.

1.3940 vs 1.3955: properties

1.39401.3955

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
145 GPa21 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
50%

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
110 J81.1 ft·lbf

Compressive Strength

—
255 MPa37 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
150 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 193 GPa28 Msi · Reduction in Area 60% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in · Hardness, Brinell 140 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 77 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F
17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
760°C1,400 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in
7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.3 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

63 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.08 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
40%

Weldability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

62 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.3 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

75%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

162 kJ/m³
168 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 24.9 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 4.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.39401.3955

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.39401.3955
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.3940 vs 1.3955 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 1.3940 and 1.3955?

Stainless Steel 1.3940 and 1.3955 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 250 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1.3955 runs hotter in service (760°C vs 425°C continuous).

Which is cheaper, 1.3940 or 1.3955?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1.3940 or 1.3955?

1.3940. Its weldability rates excellent (88/100) against very good (75/100) for 1.3955.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.3940 and 1.3955 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.