FabDigitFabDigit

Polyurea vs RPU

Polyurethane · grade comparison

Polyurea and RPU are both polyurethane grades. RPU is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for Polyurea, about 3.1 times as much. In exchange, Polyurea is the more ductile: elongation 380% versus 6% for RPU, and RPU is harder (80 Shore D vs 50 Shore D). Polyurea is lighter (1.05 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for RPU) and RPU is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0.06 GPa). On the shop floor, RPU machines more easily (excellent vs poor) and RPU sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Polyurea (premium, $$$).

PolyureaChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

RPUChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

Polyurea vs RPU: properties

PolyureaRPU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.06 GPa0.01 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

18 MPa2.6 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

380%
6%

Compressive Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.08 GPa0.01 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

95 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

50 Shore D
80 Shore D

Tear Strength

70 kN/m400 lbf/in
—

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

25%
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.87 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.48 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
1.3 MPa·√m1.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
110 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-55°C-67 °F
95°C203 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.7%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.5%
1.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
85°C185 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
130°C266 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
85°C185 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 22%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.04

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 4 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
5 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
0.9%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
35°C95 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
55°C131 °F

Same in both: Weldability 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
103 MJ/kg44,282 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
230 L/kg27.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
3%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polyurethane grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

71015203050701.11.21.31.4Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPolyureaRPU
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Polyurea vs RPU — frequently asked

Is RPU stronger than Polyurea?

Yes. RPU has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for Polyurea — about 3.1 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Polyurea or RPU?

RPU is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Polyurea is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Polyurea or RPU?

RPU. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (25/100) for Polyurea.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Polyurea and RPU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.