FabDigitFabDigit

RPET GF30 vs RPET IM

Polymer · RPET grade comparison

RPET GF30 and RPET IM are two grades of the same polymer grade, RPET: GF30 (30% glass-fibre reinforced, heat-stabilized rPET compound) versus IM (impact-modified rPET compound). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. RPET GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for RPET IM, about 24% more; tensile strength follows at 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi). In exchange, RPET IM is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 2.5% for RPET GF30, and RPET GF30 is harder (82 Shore D vs 75 Shore D). RPET IM is lighter (1.33 g/cm³ vs 1.57 g/cm³ for RPET GF30) and RPET GF30 is stiffer (9 GPa vs 2.1 GPa). On the shop floor, RPET IM machines more easily (good vs fair).

RPET GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

RPET IMChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

RPET GF30 vs RPET IM: properties

RPET GF30RPET IM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
150%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Flexural Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

8.8 GPa1.3 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Shear Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in
6.5 MPa·√m5.9 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

80 J/m1.5 ft·lbf/in
110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
75 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

96 HRM
80 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
110 HRR

Same in both: Shear Modulus 0.95 GPa0.14 Msi · Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.58 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.4 · Compressive Modulus 2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.57 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.33 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 250°C482 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 78°C172 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.2% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.55% · Refractive Index 1.575 · Light Transmission 86%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

27 µm/m·K15 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

130°C266 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

240°C464 °F
68°C154 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

215°C419 °F
62°C144 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

80°C176 °F
74°C165 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
20%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.2 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
68 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
72 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
1.5%

Melt Flow Rate

30 g/10 min
20 g/10 min

Mold Temperature (typ.)

135°C275 °F
25°C77 °F

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 275°C527 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

60%
100%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 35 MJ/kg15,047 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleRPET

RPET GF30 vs RPET IM — frequently asked

Is RPET GF30 stronger than RPET IM?

Yes. RPET GF30 has a typical yield strength of 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for RPET IM — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, GF30 or IM?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, RPET GF30 or RPET IM?

RPET IM. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (40/100) for RPET GF30.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in RPET GF30 and RPET IM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.