FabDigitFabDigit

PTT FR-V0 vs PTT GF30

Polymer · PTT grade comparison

PTT FR-V0 and PTT GF30 are two grades of the same polymer grade, PTT: FR-V0 (flame-retardant, unfilled) versus GF30 (30 % glass-fiber reinforced). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. PTT GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PTT FR-V0, about 16% more; tensile strength follows at 138 MPa (20 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi). In exchange, PTT FR-V0 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 2.5% for PTT GF30. PTT FR-V0 is lighter (1.45 g/cm³ vs 1.55 g/cm³ for PTT GF30) and PTT GF30 is stiffer (9.5 GPa vs 2.9 GPa). On the shop floor, PTT FR-V0 machines more easily (good vs fair) and PTT GF30 welds better (very good vs fair).

PTT FR-V0Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PTT GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PTT FR-V0 vs PTT GF30: properties

PTT FR-V0PTT GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Flexural Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
9 GPa1.3 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in
90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

79 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

74 HRM
72 HRM

Same in both: Shear Modulus 0.95 GPa0.14 Msi · Bulk Modulus 5 GPa0.65 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.4 · Compressive Modulus 2.5 GPa0.36 Msi · Hardness, Rockwell R 117 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.45 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.55 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 228°C442 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 50°C122 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.15% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.4% · Refractive Index 1.6

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
27 µm/m·K15 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

105°C221 °F
224°C435 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
215°C419 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

170°C338 °F
175°C347 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

30%
22%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,350 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

500 V
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 22 kV/mm559 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.2 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.018 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

76 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

50 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

28 / 100
50 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.1%
0.35%

Melt Flow Rate

22 g/10 min
30 g/10 min

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 250°C482 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePTT

PTT FR-V0 vs PTT GF30 — frequently asked

Is PTT GF30 stronger than PTT FR-V0?

Yes. PTT GF30 has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PTT FR-V0 — about 16% more. Tensile strength is 138 MPa (20 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, FR-V0 or GF30?

UNF is the default PTT condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither FR-V0 nor GF30). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, PTT FR-V0 or PTT GF30?

PTT FR-V0. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (45/100) for PTT GF30; for welding the order is PTT GF30 first (very good, 70/100) then PTT FR-V0 (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PTT FR-V0 and PTT GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.