PPE/PPO GF30 vs PPE/PPO UVS
Polymer · PPE/PPO grade comparison
PPE/PPO GF30 and PPE/PPO UVS are two grades of the same polymer grade, PPE/PPO: GF30 (30% glass-fiber reinforced modified PPO) versus UVS (uV-stabilized / weatherable modified PPO). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. PPE/PPO GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PPE/PPO UVS, about 98% more. In exchange, PPE/PPO UVS is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 3.5% for PPE/PPO GF30. PPE/PPO UVS is lighter (1.07 g/cm³ vs 1.27 g/cm³ for PPE/PPO GF30) and PPE/PPO GF30 is stiffer (8.3 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PPE/PPO UVS machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100) and PPE/PPO UVS welds better (very good vs good).
PPE/PPO GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.
PPE/PPO UVSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
PPE/PPO GF30 vs PPE/PPO UVS: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Flexural Strength
Flexural Modulus
Shear Strength
Izod Impact, Notched
Hardness, Shore D
Hardness, Rockwell R
Same in both: Shear Modulus 0.9 GPa0.13 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Compressive Modulus 2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Water Absorption (24 h)
Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 150°C302 °F · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.2%
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa
Vicat Softening Point (B50)
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 24% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 130°C266 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.6 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.001 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 400 V
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
UV / Weathering Resistance
Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 80 / 100
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Mold Shrinkage
Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100 · Melt Flow Rate 8 g/10 min · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 280°C536 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 90°C194 °F
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 10%
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
PPE/PPO GF30 vs PPE/PPO UVS — frequently asked
Is PPE/PPO GF30 stronger than PPE/PPO UVS?
Yes. PPE/PPO GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PPE/PPO UVS — about 98% more.
Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, GF30 or UVS?
Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.
Which is easier to machine, PPE/PPO GF30 or PPE/PPO UVS?
PPE/PPO UVS, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for PPE/PPO GF30; for welding the order is PPE/PPO UVS first (very good, 70/100) then PPE/PPO GF30 (good, 55/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PPE/PPO GF30 and PPE/PPO UVS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.