FabDigitFabDigit

PP-H GF40 vs PP-H HP PP

Polymer · PP-H grade comparison

PP-H GF40 and HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF) are two grades of the same polymer grade, PP-H: GF40 (40 % coupled glass-fiber reinforced PP homopolymer) versus HP PP. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. PP-H GF40 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF), about 3.5 times as much. In exchange, HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF) is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 2.5% for PP-H GF40. HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF) is lighter (0.89 g/cm³ vs 1.22 g/cm³ for PP-H GF40) and PP-H GF40 is stiffer (8.5 GPa vs 1.6 GPa).

PP-H GF40Choose it when strength drives the design.

HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF)Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PP-H GF40 vs HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF): properties

PP-H GF40HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

8.5 GPa1.2 Msi
1.6 GPa0.23 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.5 GPa0.07 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

2.5%
20%

Compressive Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

8 GPa1.2 Msi
—

Shear Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

5 MPa·√m4.6 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

72 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

85 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

110 HRR
—

Charpy Impact, Notched (ISO 179)

—
3.5 kJ/m²1.7 ft·lbf/in²

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.22 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.89 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

165°C329 °F
138°C280 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-10°C14 °F
—

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
—

Refractive Index

1.49
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
—

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
—

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

130°C266 °F
—

Min Service Temperature

-10°C14 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

160°C320 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

155°C311 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

160°C320 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
—

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
—

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.25
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
—

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
—

UV / Weathering Resistance

20 / 100
—

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
—

Weldability

60 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
—

Polishability

30 / 100
—

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
—

Melt Flow Rate

4 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

35°C95 °F
—

Powder Particle Size (D50)

—
62 µm

Powder Bulk Density

—
0.34 g/cm³0.012 lb/in³

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
—

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
—

Embodied Water

100 L/kg12 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

3%
—

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePP-H

PP-H GF40 vs HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF) — frequently asked

Is PP-H GF40 stronger than HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF)?

Yes. PP-H GF40 has a typical tensile strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF) — about 3.5 times as much.

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, GF40 or HP PP?

UNF is the default PP-H condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither GF40 nor HP PP). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

When should I choose PP-H GF40 over HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF)?

Pick PP-H GF40 when strength drives the design. Pick HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF) when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PP-H GF40 and HP 3D High Reusability PP (enabled by Forward AM / BASF) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.