FabDigitFabDigit

POM-C UV ESD vs POM-C UV GF30

Polymer · POM-C UV grade comparison

POM-C UV ESD and POM-C UV GF30 are two grades of the same polymer grade, POM-C UV: ESD (antistatic / conductive carbon-modified POM-C) versus GF30 (30 % glass-fiber reinforced POM-C). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. POM-C UV GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for POM-C UV ESD, about 26% more; tensile strength follows at 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, POM-C UV ESD is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 2.5% for POM-C UV GF30. POM-C UV ESD is lighter (1.42 g/cm³ vs 1.63 g/cm³ for POM-C UV GF30) and POM-C UV GF30 is stiffer (9.5 GPa vs 3 GPa). On the shop floor, POM-C UV ESD machines more easily (very good vs good) and POM-C UV GF30 welds better (fair vs poor).

POM-C UV ESDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

POM-C UV GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

POM-C UV ESD vs POM-C UV GF30: properties

POM-C UV ESDPOM-C UV GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
63 MPa9.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Strength

78 MPa11.3 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
8.5 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
81 Shore D

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1 GPa0.15 Msi · Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.61 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Compressive Modulus 2.8 GPa0.41 Msi · Hardness, Rockwell M 80 HRM · Hardness, Rockwell R 118 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.63 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 166°C331 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.22% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.45 W/m·K0.26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
35 µm/m·K19.4 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

152°C306 °F
155°C311 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

96°C205 °F
162°C324 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

152°C306 °F
155°C311 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

17%
15%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

100,000 Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

100,000 Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.8 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.006 · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.9%
0.8%

Same in both: Polishability 65 / 100 · Melt Flow Rate 9 g/10 min · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 200°C392 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.4 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePOM-C UV

POM-C UV ESD vs POM-C UV GF30 — frequently asked

Is POM-C UV GF30 stronger than POM-C UV ESD?

Yes. POM-C UV GF30 has a typical yield strength of 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for POM-C UV ESD — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, ESD or GF30?

UV-BK is the default POM-C UV condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither ESD nor GF30). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, POM-C UV ESD or POM-C UV GF30?

POM-C UV ESD. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (55/100) for POM-C UV GF30; for welding the order is POM-C UV GF30 first (fair, 35/100) then POM-C UV ESD (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM-C UV ESD and POM-C UV GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.