FabDigitFabDigit

CPET GF30 vs CPET rPET

Polymer · CPET grade comparison

CPET GF30 and CPET rPET are two grades of the same polymer grade, CPET: GF30 (30% glass-fiber reinforced crystalline PET) versus rPET (recycled-content CPET sheet). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. CPET GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for CPET rPET, about 5% more; tensile strength follows at 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) vs 58 MPa (8.41 ksi). In exchange, CPET rPET is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 2.5% for CPET GF30. CPET rPET is lighter (1.38 g/cm³ vs 1.56 g/cm³ for CPET GF30) and CPET GF30 is stiffer (9.5 GPa vs 2.7 GPa). On the shop floor, CPET rPET machines more easily (good vs fair) and CPET GF30 welds better (good vs poor).

CPET GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

CPET rPETChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CPET GF30 vs CPET rPET: properties

CPET GF30CPET rPET

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9.5 GPa1.4 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
25%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
84 MPa12.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
47 MPa6.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in
32 J/m0.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
84 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
92 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
116 HRR

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1 GPa0.15 Msi · Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.64 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.4 · Compressive Modulus 2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.56 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.38 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 250°C482 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 78°C172 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.1% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.5% · Refractive Index 1.575

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
62 µm/m·K34.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
110°C230 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

240°C464 °F
208°C406 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

225°C437 °F
85°C185 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

190°C374 °F
188°C370 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 22% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 220°C428 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
58 / 100

Weldability

65 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

30 g/10 min
32 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 278°C532 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 140°C284 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
1.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Water 80 L/kg9.6 gal/lb

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCPET

CPET GF30 vs CPET rPET — frequently asked

Is CPET GF30 stronger than CPET rPET?

Yes. CPET GF30 has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for CPET rPET — about 5% more. Tensile strength is 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) vs 58 MPa (8.41 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, GF30 or rPET?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, CPET GF30 or CPET rPET?

CPET rPET. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (45/100) for CPET GF30; for welding the order is CPET GF30 first (good, 65/100) then CPET rPET (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPET GF30 and CPET rPET side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.