FabDigitFabDigit

Alumide vs Stratasys PC-ISO

Polymer · grade comparison

Alumide and PC-ISO are both polymer grades, both specialty plastic. PC-ISO is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 57 MPa (8.27 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for Alumide, about 19% more. PC-ISO is the more ductile: elongation 4.3% versus 3.5% for Alumide, and PC-ISO is harder (80 Shore D vs 76 Shore D). PC-ISO is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.36 g/cm³ for Alumide) and Alumide is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 2 GPa). On the shop floor, PC-ISO welds better (good vs poor) and Alumide sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PC-ISO (high, $$$$).

AlumideChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

PC-ISOChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Alumide vs PC-ISO: properties

AlumidePC-ISO

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
57 MPa8.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

3.5%
4.3%

Compressive Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in
86 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

76 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

108 HRR
115 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.48 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Shear Strength

—
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
70 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.36 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

176°C349 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

48°C118 °F
161°C322 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.9%
0.35%

Refractive Index

—
1.586

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.5 W/m·K0.29 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
118°C244 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

170°C338 °F
133°C271 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

115°C239 °F
127°C261 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

168°C334 °F
150°C302 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
26%

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

—
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
2.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.01

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
250 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

15 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
350°C662 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
145°C293 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8 kg CO₂/kg
6.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.8 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleStratasys PC-ISOAlumide

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlumidePC-ISO
Default conditionStandard—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for 3D printing. Both take the same 10 finishes: Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

Alumide vs PC-ISO — frequently asked

Is PC-ISO stronger than Alumide?

Yes. PC-ISO has a typical tensile strength of 57 MPa (8.27 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for Alumide — about 19% more.

Which is cheaper, Alumide or PC-ISO?

Alumide is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PC-ISO is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Alumide or PC-ISO?

PC-ISO. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (15/100) for Alumide.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alumide and PC-ISO side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.