FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Nimonic 86-AW vs Nimonic 86-CD

Nickel Alloy · Nimonic 86 temper comparison

Nimonic 86-AW and Nimonic 86-CD are two conditions of the same nickel alloy grade, Nimonic 86: AW (as-welded deposit) versus CD (cold drawn). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. Nimonic 86-CD is the stronger of the two: yield strength 700 MPa (102 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for Nimonic 86-AW, about 67% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi). In exchange, Nimonic 86-AW is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 25% for Nimonic 86-CD, and Nimonic 86-CD is harder (260 HB vs 210 HB). Nimonic 86-AW runs hotter in service (1,000°C vs 600°C continuous).

Nimonic 86-AWChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Nimonic 86-CDChoose it when strength drives the design.

Nimonic 86-AW vs Nimonic 86-CD: properties

Nimonic 86-AWNimonic 86-CD

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

216 GPa31.3 Msi
218 GPa31.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
25%

Reduction in Area

40%
35%

Shear Strength

490 MPa71.1 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

210 HB
260 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
100 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
272 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 84 GPa12.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 172 GPa24.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.31

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8.5 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,330°C2,426 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,380°C2,516 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,000°C1,832 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 10 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 440 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 285 J/g123 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.4 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.24×10⁻⁶ Ω·m48.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

76 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
26 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

11%
14%

Weldability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Castability 35 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 14.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleNimonic 86

Nimonic 86-AW vs Nimonic 86-CD — frequently asked

Is Nimonic 86-CD stronger than Nimonic 86-AW?

Yes. Nimonic 86-CD has a typical yield strength of 700 MPa (102 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for Nimonic 86-AW — about 67% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, AW or CD?

SA is the default Nimonic 86 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither AW nor CD). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, Nimonic 86-AW or Nimonic 86-CD?

Nimonic 86-CD, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 26/100 against 20/100 for Nimonic 86-AW; for welding the order is Nimonic 86-AW first (very good, 70/100) then Nimonic 86-CD (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Nimonic 86-AW and Nimonic 86-CD side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.