Copper Alloy C79800-H02 vs C79800-O61
Copper Alloy · C79800 temper comparison
C79800-H02 and C79800-O61 are two conditions of the same copper alloy grade, C79800: H02 (half hard) versus O61 (annealed). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. C79800-H02 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for C79800-O61, about 135% more; tensile strength follows at 525 MPa (76.1 ksi) vs 400 MPa (58 ksi). In exchange, C79800-O61 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 15% for C79800-H02, and C79800-H02 is harder (155 HB vs 100 HB).
C79800-H02Choose it when strength drives the design.
C79800-O61Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
C79800-H02 vs C79800-O61: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 117 GPa17 Msi · Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Same in both: Density 8.69 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 890°C1,634 °F · Liquidus Temperature 925°C1,697 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V · Corrosion Resistance 55 / 100
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Formability (cold)
Same in both: Weldability 15 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100 · Polishability 85 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.8 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
C79800-H02 vs C79800-O61 — frequently asked
Is C79800-H02 stronger than C79800-O61?
Yes. C79800-H02 has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for C79800-O61 — about 135% more. Tensile strength is 525 MPa (76.1 ksi) vs 400 MPa (58 ksi).
Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, H02 or O61?
H02 is the default C79800 condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.
Which is easier to machine, C79800-H02 or C79800-O61?
C79800-H02, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 68/100 against 62/100 for C79800-O61.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C79800-H02 and C79800-O61 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.