FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C72500 vs C74500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C72500 and C74500 are both copper alloy grades. C72500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for C74500, about 20% more. In exchange, C74500 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 9% for C72500, and C72500 is harder (172 HV vs 158 HV). C72500 is stiffer (138 GPa vs 127 GPa) and C74500 runs hotter in service (180°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, C72500 welds better (good vs fair).

C72500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

C74500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C72500 vs C74500: properties

C72500C74500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
127 GPa18.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

52 GPa7.5 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
12%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

76 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

172 HV
158 HV

Hardness, Brinell

—
150 HB

Same in both: Shear Strength 330 MPa47.9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,060°C1,940 °F
954°C1,749 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,127°C2,061 °F
1,021°C1,870 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
180°C356 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
195 J/g83.8 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.57×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.18 µΩ·in
1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.22 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
20%

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.5 MN·m/kg
14.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

835 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.4 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74500C72500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC72500C74500
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C72500 vs C74500 — frequently asked

Is C72500 stronger than C74500?

Yes. C72500 has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for C74500 — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C72500 or C74500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C72500 or C74500?

C72500. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for C74500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C72500 and C74500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.