FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) vs SAN Foam Core

Composite · grade comparison

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) and SAN Foam Core are both composite grades. Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 2 MPa (0.247 ksi) for SAN Foam Core, about 76 times as much. SAN Foam Core is lighter (0.08 g/cm³ vs 1.35 g/cm³ for Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM)) and Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) is stiffer (70 GPa vs 0.07 GPa). On the shop floor, SAN Foam Core machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than SAN Foam Core (high, $$$$).

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

SAN Foam CoreChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) vs SAN Foam Core: properties

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM)SAN Foam Core

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
0.07 GPa0.01 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
2 MPa0.25 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

5%
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

—
0.3

Compressive Strength

—
1 MPa0.15 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
0.07 GPa0.01 Msi

Shear Strength

—
0.98 MPa0.14 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
0.08 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
105°C221 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
0.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

24 µm/m·K13.3 µin/in·°F
60 µm/m·K33.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
70°C158 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Specific Heat Capacity

—
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

—
90°C194 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
1.08

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
—

UV / Weathering Resistance

90 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
92 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

—
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

—
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

—
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

96 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

51.9 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAluminum Composite Panel (ACM)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAluminum Composite Panel (ACM)SAN Foam Core
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionPE Core—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
PaintingYes—

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) vs SAN Foam Core — frequently asked

Is Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) stronger than SAN Foam Core?

Yes. Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) has a typical tensile strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 2 MPa (0.247 ksi) for SAN Foam Core — about 76 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) or SAN Foam Core?

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while SAN Foam Core is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) or SAN Foam Core?

SAN Foam Core. Its machinability rates excellent (92/100) against very good (80/100) for Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) and SAN Foam Core side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.