FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) vs EPS Foam Core

Composite · grade comparison

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) and EPS Foam Core are both composite grades. Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi) for EPS Foam Core, about 520 times as much. Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3.5% for EPS Foam Core. EPS Foam Core is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 1.35 g/cm³ for Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM)) and Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) is stiffer (70 GPa vs 0.01 GPa).

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EPS Foam CoreChoose it when weight is the constraint.

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) vs EPS Foam Core: properties

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM)EPS Foam Core

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
0.25 MPa0.04 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

5%
3.5%

Shear Modulus

—
0 GPa3.05×10⁻⁴ Msi

Poisson's Ratio

—
0.1

Compressive Strength

—
0.11 MPa0.02 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Flexural Strength

—
0.24 MPa0.03 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Strength

—
0.14 MPa0.02 ksi

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
5%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
0.02 g/cm³7.95×10⁻⁴ lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
100°C212 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

24 µm/m·K13.3 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
75°C167 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Specific Heat Capacity

—
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

—
90°C194 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
1.03

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

90 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
—

Polishability

—
5 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
0.4%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

—
98 MJ/kg42,132 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

—
3.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

—
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

96 kN·m/kg
11 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

51.9 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAluminum Composite Panel (ACM)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAluminum Composite Panel (ACM)EPS Foam Core
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionPE Core—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
PaintingYes—

Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) vs EPS Foam Core — frequently asked

Is Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) stronger than EPS Foam Core?

Yes. Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) has a typical tensile strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi) for EPS Foam Core — about 520 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) or EPS Foam Core?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) or EPS Foam Core?

EPS Foam Core. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Aluminum Composite Panel (ACM) and EPS Foam Core side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.