FabDigitFabDigit

Al2O3/SiCw vs Si3N4/SiCw

Composite · grade comparison

Al2O3/SiCw and Si3N4/SiCw are both composite grades. Si3N4/SiCw is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for Al2O3/SiCw, about 43% more. Si3N4/SiCw is the more ductile: elongation 0.15% versus 0.1% for Al2O3/SiCw. Si3N4/SiCw is lighter (3.22 g/cm³ vs 3.74 g/cm³ for Al2O3/SiCw) and Al2O3/SiCw is stiffer (390 GPa vs 320 GPa).

Si3N4/SiCwChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Al2O3/SiCw vs Si3N4/SiCw: properties

Al2O3/SiCwSi3N4/SiCw

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

390 GPa56.6 Msi
320 GPa46.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
126 GPa18.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

250 GPa36.3 Msi
232 GPa33.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.24
0.27

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.1%
0.15%

Flexural Strength

750 MPa109 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Flexural Modulus

390 GPa56.6 Msi
315 GPa45.7 Msi

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

8 MPa·√m7.3 ksi·√in
8.5 MPa·√m7.7 ksi·√in

Same in both: Compressive Strength 3,000 MPa435 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

3.74 g/cm³0.14 lb/in³
3.22 g/cm³0.12 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

800 J/kg·K0.19 BTU/lb·°F
700 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

6.6 µm/m·K3.7 µin/in·°F
3.4 µm/m·K1.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,200°C2,192 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 1,500°C2,732 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

0.5 Ω·m1.97×10⁷ µΩ·in
1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
9.5

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁰ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

5 / 100
4 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

160 MJ/kg68,788 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
30 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

94 kN·m/kg
155 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

104.3 MN·m/kg
99.4 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

10.7 mm²/s
14.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAl2O3/SiCwSi3N4/SiCw
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Al2O3/SiCw vs Si3N4/SiCw — frequently asked

Is Si3N4/SiCw stronger than Al2O3/SiCw?

Yes. Si3N4/SiCw has a typical tensile strength of 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for Al2O3/SiCw — about 43% more.

Which is cheaper, Al2O3/SiCw or Si3N4/SiCw?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose Al2O3/SiCw over Si3N4/SiCw?

Pick Si3N4/SiCw when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Al2O3/SiCw and Si3N4/SiCw side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.