FabDigitFabDigit

2124/SiC/25p vs N-1

Composite · grade comparison

2124/SiC/25p and N-1 are both composite grades. 2124/SiC/25p is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for N-1, about 7.8 times as much. N-1 is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 2.88 g/cm³ for 2124/SiC/25p) and 2124/SiC/25p is stiffer (114 GPa vs 5.5 GPa). On the shop floor, N-1 machines more easily (good vs not recommended).

2124/SiC/25pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

N-1Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

2124/SiC/25p vs N-1: properties

2124/SiC/25pN-1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
5.5 GPa0.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

3%
—

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

116 GPa16.8 Msi
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Flexural Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
6 GPa0.87 Msi

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

—
130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
100 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.88 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
1.8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.28 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
105°C221 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
130°C266 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
28%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.56 µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.04

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
175 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
65 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

18 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

215 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

39.6 MN·m/kg
4.8 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

58.6 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

51
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2124/SiC/25p

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2124/SiC/25pN-1
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

2124/SiC/25p vs N-1 — frequently asked

Is 2124/SiC/25p stronger than N-1?

Yes. 2124/SiC/25p has a typical tensile strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for N-1 — about 7.8 times as much.

Which is cheaper, 2124/SiC/25p or N-1?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2124/SiC/25p or N-1?

N-1. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against not recommended (12/100) for 2124/SiC/25p.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2124/SiC/25p and N-1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.