FabDigitFabDigit

2124/SiC/25p vs Glidcop AL-15

Composite · grade comparison

2124/SiC/25p and Glidcop AL-15 are both composite grades. 2124/SiC/25p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 331 MPa (48 ksi) for Glidcop AL-15, about 45% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 413 MPa (59.9 ksi). In exchange, Glidcop AL-15 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 3% for 2124/SiC/25p. 2124/SiC/25p is lighter (2.88 g/cm³ vs 8.9 g/cm³ for Glidcop AL-15) and Glidcop AL-15 is stiffer (130 GPa vs 114 GPa). On the shop floor, Glidcop AL-15 machines more easily (fair vs not recommended).

2124/SiC/25pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Glidcop AL-15Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2124/SiC/25p vs Glidcop AL-15: properties

2124/SiC/25pGlidcop AL-15

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
413 MPa59.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
331 MPa48 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
18%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

116 GPa16.8 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.88 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
365 W/m·K211 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
16.6 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
500°C932 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.56 µΩ·in
1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

18 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

215 kN·m/kg
46 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

39.6 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,011 kJ/m³
421 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.6 mm²/s
107.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

51
70

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2124/SiC/25pGlidcop AL-15

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2124/SiC/25pGlidcop AL-15
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

2124/SiC/25p vs Glidcop AL-15 — frequently asked

Is 2124/SiC/25p stronger than Glidcop AL-15?

Yes. 2124/SiC/25p has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 331 MPa (48 ksi) for Glidcop AL-15 — about 45% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 413 MPa (59.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2124/SiC/25p or Glidcop AL-15?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2124/SiC/25p or Glidcop AL-15?

Glidcop AL-15. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against not recommended (12/100) for 2124/SiC/25p.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2124/SiC/25p and Glidcop AL-15 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.