FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum A356/SiC/10p-F vs A356/SiC/10p-T61

Aluminum · A356/SiC/10p temper comparison

A356/SiC/10p-F and A356/SiC/10p-T61 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, A356/SiC/10p: F (as fabricated) versus T61 (T6 variant, underaged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. A356/SiC/10p-T61 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 296 MPa (42.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for A356/SiC/10p-F, about 147% more; tensile strength follows at 331 MPa (48 ksi) vs 195 MPa (28.3 ksi). In exchange, A356/SiC/10p-F is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 0.6% for A356/SiC/10p-T61, and A356/SiC/10p-T61 is harder (95 HB vs 65 HB). On the shop floor, A356/SiC/10p-F welds better (fair vs poor).

A356/SiC/10p-FChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

A356/SiC/10p-T61Choose it when strength drives the design.

A356/SiC/10p-F vs A356/SiC/10p-T61: properties

A356/SiC/10p-FA356/SiC/10p-T61

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
331 MPa48 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
296 MPa42.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
0.6%

Shear Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
58 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 81.4 GPa11.8 Msi · Shear Modulus 31 GPa4.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F · Liquidus Temperature 613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

160 W/m·K92.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
172 W/m·K99.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 355 J/g153 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

31 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
52 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.8 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
24 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
38%

Weldability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
5 / 100

Same in both: Castability 75 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 15%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA356/SiC/10p

A356/SiC/10p-F vs A356/SiC/10p-T61 — frequently asked

Is A356/SiC/10p-T61 stronger than A356/SiC/10p-F?

Yes. A356/SiC/10p-T61 has a typical yield strength of 296 MPa (42.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for A356/SiC/10p-F — about 147% more. Tensile strength is 331 MPa (48 ksi) vs 195 MPa (28.3 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, F or T61?

T6 is the default A356/SiC/10p condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither F nor T61). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, A356/SiC/10p-F or A356/SiC/10p-T61?

A356/SiC/10p-F, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 24/100 for A356/SiC/10p-T61; for welding the order is A356/SiC/10p-F first (fair, 40/100) then A356/SiC/10p-T61 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A356/SiC/10p-F and A356/SiC/10p-T61 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.