FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 8281-F vs 8281-H14

Aluminum · 8281 temper comparison

8281-F and 8281-H14 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 8281: F (as fabricated) versus H14 (strain hardened, half hard). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 8281-H14 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for 8281-F, about 47% more; tensile strength follows at 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). In exchange, 8281-F is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 6% for 8281-H14, and 8281-H14 is harder (36 HB vs 30 HB). 8281-F runs hotter in service (120°C vs 110°C continuous).

8281-FChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

8281-H14Choose it when strength drives the design.

8281-F vs 8281-H14: properties

8281-F8281-H14

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
6%

Shear Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

30 HB
36 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 645°C1,193 °F · Liquidus Temperature 655°C1,211 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F
212 W/m·K122 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 395 J/g170 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

56 % IACS
55 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.08×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.21 µΩ·in
3.13×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.23 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.8 V · Corrosion Resistance 58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 70 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale8281

8281-F vs 8281-H14 — frequently asked

Is 8281-H14 stronger than 8281-F?

Yes. 8281-H14 has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for 8281-F — about 47% more. Tensile strength is 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, F or H14?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, 8281-F or 8281-H14?

8281-H14. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for 8281-F.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8281-F and 8281-H14 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.