FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 8011-H14 vs 8011-O

Aluminum · 8011 temper comparison

8011-H14 and 8011-O are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 8011: H14 (strain hardened, half hard) versus O (annealed). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 8011-H14 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for 8011-O, about 3.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 145 MPa (21 ksi) vs 95 MPa (13.8 ksi). In exchange, 8011-O is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 4% for 8011-H14, and 8011-H14 is harder (42 HB vs 24 HB).

8011-H14Choose it when strength drives the design.

8011-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

8011-H14 vs 8011-O: properties

8011-H148011-O

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

145 MPa21 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
25%

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

42 HB
24 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Vickers 46 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 620°C1,148 °F · Liquidus Temperature 655°C1,211 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

205 W/m·K118 BTU/hr·ft·°F
215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 395 J/g170 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

45 % IACS
48 % IACS

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 3.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.84 V · Corrosion Resistance 65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Weldability 60 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale8011

8011-H14 vs 8011-O — frequently asked

Is 8011-H14 stronger than 8011-O?

Yes. 8011-H14 has a typical yield strength of 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for 8011-O — about 3.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 145 MPa (21 ksi) vs 95 MPa (13.8 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, H14 or O?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, 8011-H14 or 8011-O?

8011-H14, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 22/100 for 8011-O.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8011-H14 and 8011-O side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.