FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7095-F vs 7095-T651

Aluminum · 7095 temper comparison

7095-F and 7095-T651 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 7095: F (as fabricated) versus T651 (T6, stress relieved by stretching). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 7095-T651 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 675 MPa (97.9 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 7095-F, about 170% more; tensile strength follows at 710 MPa (103 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi). In exchange, 7095-F is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for 7095-T651, and 7095-T651 is harder (190 HB vs 110 HB). 7095-F runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 7095-F conducts heat better (155 W/m·K vs 135 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 7095-T651 machines more easily (very good vs good).

7095-FChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

7095-T651Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

7095-F vs 7095-T651: properties

7095-F7095-T651

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
710 MPa103 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
675 MPa97.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
10%

Reduction in Area

18%
20%

Compressive Strength

255 MPa37 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Shear Strength

230 MPa33.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

110 MPa16 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Vickers

118 HV
205 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71.5 GPa10.4 Msi · Shear Modulus 27 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 74 GPa10.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.86 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 470°C878 °F · Liquidus Temperature 630°C1,166 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 385 J/g166 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

38 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.54×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.79 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.84 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
70%

Weldability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Castability 20 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 10 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 5%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale7095

7095-F vs 7095-T651 — frequently asked

Is 7095-T651 stronger than 7095-F?

Yes. 7095-T651 has a typical yield strength of 675 MPa (97.9 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 7095-F — about 170% more. Tensile strength is 710 MPa (103 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, F or T651?

T651 is the default 7095 condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 7095-F or 7095-T651?

7095-T651. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for 7095-F; for welding the order is 7095-F first (poor, 20/100) then 7095-T651 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7095-F and 7095-T651 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.