FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6951-T4 vs 6951-T5

Aluminum · 6951 temper comparison

6951-T4 and 6951-T5 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 6951: T4 (solution heat treated and naturally aged) versus T5 (cooled from hot working and artificially aged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 6951-T5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for 6951-T4, about 36% more. In exchange, 6951-T4 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 12% for 6951-T5, and 6951-T5 is harder (68 HB vs 62 HB). 6951-T5 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous).

6951-T4Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6951-T5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

6951-T4 vs 6951-T5: properties

6951-T46951-T5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
12%

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

62 HB
68 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 616°C1,141 °F · Liquidus Temperature 654°C1,209 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F
185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 393 J/g169 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

43 % IACS
46 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in
3.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.48 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
56 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.8 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
110%

Weldability

72 / 100
68 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
52 / 100

Same in both: Castability 40 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 95 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6951

6951-T4 vs 6951-T5 — frequently asked

Is 6951-T5 stronger than 6951-T4?

Yes. 6951-T5 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for 6951-T4 — about 36% more. Tensile strength is 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) vs 220 MPa (31.9 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, T4 or T5?

O is the default 6951 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither T4 nor T5). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 6951-T4 or 6951-T5?

6951-T5. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for 6951-T4.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6951-T4 and 6951-T5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.