FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2050-T3 vs 2050-T86

Aluminum · 2050 temper comparison

2050-T3 and 2050-T86 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2050: T3 (solution heat treated, cold worked and naturally aged) versus T86 (solution heat treated, heavily cold worked and artificially aged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2050-T86 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 2050-T3, about 69% more; tensile strength follows at 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) vs 440 MPa (63.8 ksi). In exchange, 2050-T3 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 7% for 2050-T86, and 2050-T86 is harder (160 HB vs 115 HB). 2050-T86 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 2050-T86 conducts heat better (98 W/m·K vs 85 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 2050-T86 machines more easily (very good vs good).

2050-T3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2050-T86Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

2050-T3 vs 2050-T86: properties

2050-T32050-T86

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

76.5 GPa11.1 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

440 MPa63.8 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
7%

Shear Strength

265 MPa38.4 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

115 HB
160 HB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 29 GPa4.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 560°C1,040 °F · Liquidus Temperature 645°C1,193 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

85 W/m·K49.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
98 W/m·K56.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

24 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

36 / 100
42 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.72 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
250%

Weldability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
22 / 100

Same in both: Castability 30 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 15 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 8%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2050

2050-T3 vs 2050-T86 — frequently asked

Is 2050-T86 stronger than 2050-T3?

Yes. 2050-T86 has a typical yield strength of 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 2050-T3 — about 69% more. Tensile strength is 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) vs 440 MPa (63.8 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, T3 or T86?

T84 is the default 2050 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither T3 nor T86). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 2050-T3 or 2050-T86?

2050-T86. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for 2050-T3; for welding the order is 2050-T3 first (fair, 35/100) then 2050-T86 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2050-T3 and 2050-T86 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.