FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2017A-O vs 2017A-T351

Aluminum · 2017A temper comparison

2017A-O and 2017A-T351 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2017A: O (annealed) versus T351 (T3, stress relieved by stretching). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2017A-T351 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for 2017A-O, about 3.7 times as much; tensile strength follows at 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi). In exchange, 2017A-O is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 13% for 2017A-T351, and 2017A-T351 is harder (112 HB vs 45 HB). 2017A-O runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 2017A-O conducts heat better (193 W/m·K vs 134 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 2017A-T351 machines more easily (very good vs fair).

2017A-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2017A-T351Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

2017A-O vs 2017A-T351: properties

2017A-O2017A-T351

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
13%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Shear Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
112 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

62 HRB
63 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

48 HV
120 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 72.5 GPa10.5 Msi · Shear Modulus 27 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 512°C954 °F · Liquidus Temperature 641°C1,186 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

193 W/m·K112 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 873 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

50 % IACS
34 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in
5.07×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.69 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
78%

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 20 / 100 · Castability 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 15 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2017A

2017A-O vs 2017A-T351 — frequently asked

Is 2017A-T351 stronger than 2017A-O?

Yes. 2017A-T351 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for 2017A-O — about 3.7 times as much. Tensile strength is 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, O or T351?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, 2017A-O or 2017A-T351?

2017A-T351. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against fair (45/100) for 2017A-O.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2017A-O and 2017A-T351 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.