FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2014A-O vs 2014A-T6

Aluminum · 2014A temper comparison

2014A-O and 2014A-T6 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2014A: O (annealed) versus T6 (solution heat treated and artificially aged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2014A-T6 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 414 MPa (60 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for 2014A-O, about 4.4 times as much; tensile strength follows at 483 MPa (70.1 ksi) vs 185 MPa (26.8 ksi). In exchange, 2014A-O is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 11% for 2014A-T6, and 2014A-T6 is harder (135 HB vs 45 HB). 2014A-O runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and 2014A-O conducts heat better (190 W/m·K vs 155 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 2014A-T6 machines more easily (very good vs fair) and 2014A-O welds better (fair vs poor).

2014A-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2014A-T6Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

2014A-O vs 2014A-T6: properties

2014A-O2014A-T6

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

185 MPa26.8 ksi
483 MPa70.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
414 MPa60 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
11%

Compressive Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Shear Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in
24 MPa·√m21.8 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
135 HB

Hardness, Vickers

48 HV
142 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 73 GPa10.6 Msi · Shear Modulus 28 GPa4.1 Msi · Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Reduction in Area 25% · Hardness, Rockwell B 80 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 507°C945 °F · Liquidus Temperature 638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

50 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in
4.31×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

38 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
22 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 300% · Castability 30 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 15 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 15%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2014A

2014A-O vs 2014A-T6 — frequently asked

Is 2014A-T6 stronger than 2014A-O?

Yes. 2014A-T6 has a typical yield strength of 414 MPa (60 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for 2014A-O — about 4.4 times as much. Tensile strength is 483 MPa (70.1 ksi) vs 185 MPa (26.8 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, O or T6?

T651 is the default 2014A condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither O nor T6). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 2014A-O or 2014A-T6?

2014A-T6. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (45/100) for 2014A-O; for welding the order is 2014A-O first (fair, 35/100) then 2014A-T6 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2014A-O and 2014A-T6 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.