FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4848 vs ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4848 and ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2 are both stainless steel grades. ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for 1.4848, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 530 MPa (76.9 ksi). ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 14% for 1.4848.

ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4848 vs ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2: properties

1.4848ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

147 GPa21.3 Msi
154 GPa22.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
18%

Reduction in Area

15%
20%

Shear Strength

345 MPa50 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
22 J16.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
185 HB

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
195 HV

Compressive Strength

—
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 185 GPa26.8 Msi · Shear Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Hardness, Rockwell B 90 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,410°C2,570 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,370°C2,498 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14.5 W/m·K8.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
265 J/g114 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.9 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V · Corrosion Resistance 58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
30%

Weldability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.9 MN·m/kg
24 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

212 kJ/m³
260 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.6 mm²/s
3.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4848ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4848ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4848 vs ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2 — frequently asked

Is ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2 stronger than 1.4848?

Yes. ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for 1.4848 — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 530 MPa (76.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4848 or ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1.4848 or ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2?

1.4848. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against fair (40/100) for ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4848 and ZG40Cr25Ni12Si2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.