FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4837 vs 1.4848

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4837 and 1.4848 are both stainless steel grades. 1.4848 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) for 1.4837, about 6% more. 1.4848 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 12% for 1.4837.

1.4848Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4837 vs 1.4848: properties

1.48371.4848

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
147 GPa21.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
530 MPa76.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
14%

Compressive Strength

270 MPa39.2 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

15 J11.1 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
90 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 185 GPa26.8 Msi · Shear Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 15% · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 200 MPa29 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 190 HB · Hardness, Vickers 200 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,370°C2,498 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14.5 W/m·K8.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,050°C1,922 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.9 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

72 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 25%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.3 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

70%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24 MN·m/kg
23.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

190 kJ/m³
212 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
3.6 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 68 kN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.48371.4848

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.48371.4848
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4837 vs 1.4848 — frequently asked

Is 1.4848 stronger than 1.4837?

Yes. 1.4848 has a typical yield strength of 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) for 1.4837 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4837 or 1.4848?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1.4837 or 1.4848?

1.4848. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against fair (40/100) for 1.4837.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4837 and 1.4848 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.