FabDigitFabDigit

PA12 EOS PA 3200 GF vs PA12 HP PA 12 FR

Polymer · PA12 grade comparison

EOS PA 3200 GF and HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik) are two grades of the same polymer grade, PA12: EOS PA 3200 GF versus HP PA 12 FR. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. EOS PA 3200 GF is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 51 MPa (7.4 ksi) against 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) for HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik), about 11% more. EOS PA 3200 GF is the more ductile: elongation 9% versus 4.7% for HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik). HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik) is lighter (1.13 g/cm³ vs 1.22 g/cm³ for EOS PA 3200 GF) and EOS PA 3200 GF is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 2.58 GPa).

EOS PA 3200 GFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik)Choose it when weight is the constraint.

EOS PA 3200 GF vs HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik): properties

EOS PA 3200 GFHP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.2 GPa0.46 Msi
2.6 GPa0.37 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

51 MPa7.4 ksi
46 MPa6.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
4.7%

Flexural Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

73 MPa10.6 ksi
—

Charpy Impact, Unnotched (ISO 179)

35 kJ/m²16.7 ft·lbf/in²
—

Charpy Impact, Notched (ISO 179)

5.4 kJ/m²2.6 ft·lbf/in²
2.8 kJ/m²1.3 ft·lbf/in²

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.22 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.13 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
187°C369 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

96°C205 °F
97°C207 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

157°C315 °F
172°C342 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
408 V

Dielectric Strength

—
7.6 kV/mm193 V/mil

Volume Resistivity

—
4.96×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
9.74×10¹⁴ Ω

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Powder Particle Size (D50)

—
55 µm

Powder Bulk Density

—
0.47 g/cm³0.017 lb/in³

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA12

EOS PA 3200 GF vs HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik) — frequently asked

Is EOS PA 3200 GF stronger than HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik)?

Yes. EOS PA 3200 GF has a typical tensile strength of 51 MPa (7.4 ksi) against 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) for HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik) — about 11% more.

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, EOS PA 3200 GF or HP PA 12 FR?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

When should I choose EOS PA 3200 GF over HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik)?

Pick EOS PA 3200 GF when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik) when weight is the constraint.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EOS PA 3200 GF and HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 FR (enabled by Evonik) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.