Copper Alloy C97800 vs CC383H
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C97800 and CC383H are both copper alloy grades. CC383H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) for C97800, about 29% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 400 MPa (58 ksi). CC383H is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 15% for C97800, and CC383H is harder (140 HB vs 130 HB). CC383H is stiffer (150 GPa vs 124 GPa) and CC383H runs hotter in service (300°C vs 260°C continuous). On the shop floor, C97800 machines more easily (good vs poor) and CC383H welds better (very good vs poor).
C97800Choose it when the part is machined in volume.
CC383HChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
C97800 vs CC383H: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Polishability
Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 70 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.6 kg CO₂/kg
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C97800 | CC383H |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C97800 vs CC383H — frequently asked
Is CC383H stronger than C97800?
Yes. CC383H has a typical yield strength of 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) for C97800 — about 29% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 400 MPa (58 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C97800 or CC383H?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, C97800 or CC383H?
C97800. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against poor (32/100) for CC383H; for welding the order is CC383H first (very good, 80/100) then C97800 (poor, 25/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C97800 and CC383H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.