Copper Alloy C96700 vs CC383H
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C96700 and CC383H are both copper alloy grades. C96700 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for CC383H, about 114% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi). In exchange, CC383H is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 5% for C96700, and C96700 is harder (330 HB vs 140 HB). C96700 conducts heat better (33 W/m·K vs 29 W/m·K). On the shop floor, CC383H welds better (very good vs fair).
C96700Choose it when strength drives the design.
CC383HChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.
C96700 vs CC383H: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell C
Reduction in Area
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Shear Modulus 57 GPa8.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.31
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Formability (cold)
Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C96700 | CC383H |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C96700 vs CC383H — frequently asked
Is C96700 stronger than CC383H?
Yes. C96700 has a typical yield strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for CC383H — about 114% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C96700 or CC383H?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, C96700 or CC383H?
CC383H, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 25/100 for C96700; for welding the order is CC383H first (very good, 80/100) then C96700 (fair, 35/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C96700 and CC383H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.